Shamar

Clearing up misconceptions about the Christian faith and defending it.


Leave a comment

Tisha B’av

Today is Tisha B’av, the saddest day in the history of Israel as a people. Jewish people across the world mourn the various calamities that have befallen them on this day throughout history, the saddest of them all being the destruction of the temples on 586 BC and 70 AD.

The temple was the place for sacrifices, worship, reconciliation, fair judgement, repentance. It was the backbone of a Jewish existence that had Yahweh at the heart. Yahweh was the essence of Jewish identity. It was His laws that governed their living, working, worshiping, ethics, and morality. Connection with Him constituted sweetness and life. There was never anything called secular Jews or Israelis. There were Israelis, God’s chosen people.

So how important is He now in their lives? To what degree do His laws and statutes govern their life and decisions? Let’s take Pride. If the Jews still had that connection with God and respect for His laws, there would be no Gay Pride in Israel. When Chief Rabbi Shlomo Amar condemned Pride, he was condemned in return for his views. I am not a fan of the rabbinical class, but for once the chief rabbi was right–he upheld God’s laws and standards on homosexuality.

Leviticus 18:22 ESV

You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is detestable.

Leviticus 20:13 ESV

If a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination; they shall surely be put to death; their blood is upon them.

Romans 1:26-28

For this reason God gave them up to dishonourable passions. For their women exchanged natural relations for those that are contrary to nature; and the men likewise gave up natural relations with women and were consumed with passion for one another, men committing shameless acts with men and receiving in themselves the due penalty for their error.

Jude 1:7 

Just as Sodom and Gomorrah and the surrounding cities, which likewise indulged in sexual immorality and pursued unnatural desire, serve as an example by undergoing a punishment of eternal fire.

1 Corinthians 6:9-11

Or do you not know that wrongdoers will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor men who have sex with men

10 nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God.

11 And that is what some of you were. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God.

These are God’s views on homosexuality. This is what the Tanach and the Torah calls it: an abomination. Where is the place here for same sex relations and Pride?

Israel accepts that which goes against God’s word in order to be inclusive, and progressive and modern. But God says:

Romans 1:32

Although they know God’s righteous decree that those who do such things deserve death, they not only continue to do these very things but also approve of those who practice them.

So, the real Lamentation to be made this Tish B’av is not about the destruction of the temples, a thing of the past, but rather the gradual dismantling of God as the most important part of their lives. Lament that. Better still, find your way back to Yahweh.


Leave a comment

Let’s talk about Leah.

We all know the story of Yacob, Leah, and Rachel.  You can find it in Genesis Chapters 27-30.

Yacob cheated Esau out his rights as the firstborn. Furious at this deception and at the loss of his rights, Esau decided to avenge himself on Yacob by killing him. Their mother Rebekkah heard of this and urged Yacob to flee to her brother Laban who lived in Harran. She manipulated Isaac into making this possible by complaining of the Hittite women they lived among and expressing her fear that Yacob (like Esau) may also marry a Hittite woman and it would make her miserable. Isaac summoned Yacob and asked him to go to Paddan Aram and find a wife from among his mother’s family.

Yacob did as he was told. He met Rachel when he reached his destination. She took him to her home, where Yacob met her father Laban.

Laban had two daughters. The older one was Leah and she had delicate eyes. The younger one was Rachel, who was beautiful, and Yacob was in love with her. He told Laban: I’ll work for you seven years in return for your younger daughter Rachel. And Laban agreed. When he completed 7 years, Yacob asked to be given Rachel as his wife according to their agreement. There was a marriage, but Laban cunningly gave Leah in marriage to Yacob without his knowledge. It was only the next morning, after he had consummated the marriage, did Yacob realise what had happened. He confronted Laban who replied that it was not a custom among their people to get the younger daughter married before the older one. He asked Yacob to complete the bridal week with Leah and assured him that he would be given Rachel too, in exchange for 7 more years of service. Yacob, who was in love with Rachel, agreed. After completing the bridal week, Yacob was given Rachel in marriage. And thus started a tussle between Leah and Rachel for Yacob’s love and attention. To be precise, it was Leah who fought for his love and attention; Rachel already had it.

I often think about that situation and how emotionally messy it might have been for all 3 of them.

For Yacob it was messy because he had dreamed of marrying Rachel and enjoying a happy ever after with the woman he loved. Instead, he found himself married to two women—two sisters—one of whom he did not love. There must have been a certain amount of bitterness and anger in him towards Laban. He may have considered Leah an unnecessary complication in his life, as he would now have to divide time between two wives to fulfil his duties as a husband. And there could have been guilt that he did not love one of his wives, which was unfair to her.

For Rachel it was messy because from the word go, she had to share her husband with another woman…who happened to be her sister! There must have been jealousy and also maybe sadness at the whole situation.

But the one for whom this was messiest was Leah. Not only did she have to share her husband with her own sister, she had to live with the knowledge that her husband loved her sister and not her. She was aware that this marriage had been forced on him. She realised that she was probably not going to have the happy marriage that every woman looks forward to having. And she knew that she would have to fight for her husband’s attention and love.

Which she did. I am pretty sure like every new bride who has a bit of a challenge in her husband, she might have felt that given time, if she was patient, once he got to know her better, and if she loved him right, he would come around.

Unfortunately, we see that she had underestimated the challenge. Yacob was not into her, and we see that as the story of their marital life unfolds.

Seeing that she was unloved, God, out of His beautiful kindness, love, and sense of justice, opened her womb where He shut Rachel’s. Leah was pregnant. Rachel tried but could not conceive.

Heartened by the fact that she was pregnant and would give Yacob his firstborn, Leah may have felt comforted that maybe this would make him turn his attention to her. She gave birth to a son and named him Reuben, which means see, a son, and which sounds like ‘he has seen my misery’ in Hebrew. For she thought: It is because the Lord has seen my misery. Surely my husband will love me now.

But Yacob did not.

She was pregnant again. She bore Yacob a second son. She thought: Because the Lord heard that I am not loved, he gave me this one too. She named him Simeon, which probably means ‘one who hears.’

But things did not change between her and Yacob.

She was pregnant a third time. A son again. She thought: Now at last my husband will become attached to me, because I have borne him three sons. She named him Levi, which sounds like or is derived from the Hebrew word for ‘attached.’

But Yacob did not change or get attached to her as she hoped.

Then she conceived again. When she gave birth to a son she said: This time I will praise the Lord. She named him Yahudah, which sounds like and may be derived from Hebrew for ‘praise.’

After this she stopped having children for the time being.

I find this story of Leah, her life, and her unrequited love rather poignant. It contains within its folds the struggle and sadness of an unloved woman. Her hope of being loved and noticed by her husband when she chose the names for her first 3 sons is so achingly human. So is the disappointment she may have felt when it did not go that way.

I can also imagine her despair and her weariness in her own hope for a change that never came. By the time her fourth son was born, she was out of hope, out of strength, and had probably lost all her illusions. So, this time around, instead of naming her fourth son to celebrate a possibility, she chose to praise God and used that as a root for her son’s name.

In the moment that she named her last son, she turned away from everything and everyone else and invested all her attention and love into God, giving Him first place. Unlike Yacob, God did not let her devotion and love for Him go unnoticed or unrewarded. He loved her back immediately. And he honoured her more than she could ever have imagined. For from Yahudah came Obed and Jesse and David and Shalmon and Yosef. And from Yosef came Yeshua, the Messiah, the Lamb of God, the Son, the Redeemer who would save the whole world.

Had she known this, maybe she would have forgotten her sadness. She would have felt special. She would have felt redeemed.

This post is for all the ones who love deeply and are not loved back. Take your cuts and bruises to God. He cares more than anyone else does or can. And He can sort things better than anyone else can.

Shalom.


Leave a comment

A man called Joshua.

When we think of the Old Testament, most Christians think of the more dazzling stars from that set of books—Abraham, Moshe (Moses), Shaul (Saul), David, Iyob (Job), Shalmon (Solomon), Yonah (Jonah), Eliyah (Elijah), Elisha, maybe Yashayah (Isaiah). The bad boys are remembered too—Ahab, Manasseh, Abshalom, Galyath (Goliath), Cain, Pharaoh, Balaam and Balaak, the 10 guys who discouraged Israel from entering Canaan.

So when we say Joshua or Yahoshua, there is a slight blank space. Slight, because no God-fearing Christian would ever not know that Yahoshua took a handover from Moshe and led the Israelites into the promised land. He is essentially seen as someone who completed a task that Moshe had been chosen for but could not finish, was not allowed to finish. Hence, Yahoshua was chosen to take over and take the Israelites on that final leg of their journey into the land of Canaan.

Not much is written about Yahoshua. Sure, there is an entire book titled: Yahoshua, but it is more of a record of how he led the people into the land, the battles he fought, the division of the land among the tribes, some degree of arbitration of disputes, a call to eschew idolatry, and then his eventual demise. None of this gives us an insight into his humanity, his human-ness. No relatable emotional blips on the radar, no stumbling, no rebellions—just a guy with a sword who stayed on in long battles and got the job done. He could be called a military commander, but as military commanders go, David was more interesting! Yahoshua, on the other hand, was a sensible, calm fighter. Reliable. Hard working. Brave. Conscientious. Solid but not the kind of guy who you drew inspiration from the way you did from Abraham’s faith, David’s love for God, Moshe’s closeness to God, Shalmon’s wisdom, or Iyob’s dogged belief in his innocence.

Did you know this happened in Joshua Chapter 10 (NIV Version)?

1 Now Adoni-Zedek king of Jerusalem heard that Joshua had taken Ai and totally destroyed it, doing to Ai and its king as he had done to Jericho and its king, and that the people of Gibeon had made a treaty of peace with Israel and had become their allies. 2 He and his people were very much alarmed at this, because Gibeon was an important city, like one of the royal cities; it was larger than Ai, and all its men were good fighters. 3 So Adoni-Zedek king of Jerusalem appealed to Hoham king of Hebron, Piram king of Jarmuth, Japhia king of Lachish and Debir king of Eglon. 4 “Come up and help me attack Gibeon,” he said, “because it has made peace with Joshua and the Israelites.”

5 Then the five kings of the Amorites—the kings of Jerusalem, Hebron, Jarmuth, Lachish and Eglon—joined forces. They moved up with all their troops and took up positions against Gibeon and attacked it.

6 The Gibeonites then sent word to Joshua in the camp at Gilgal: “Do not abandon your servants. Come up to us quickly and save us! Help us, because all the Amorite kings from the hill country have joined forces against us.”

7 So Joshua marched up from Gilgal with his entire army, including all the best fighting men. 8 The Lord said to Joshua, “Do not be afraid of them; I have given them into your hand. Not one of them will be able to withstand you.”

9 After an all-night march from Gilgal, Joshua took them by surprise. 10 The Lord threw them into confusion before Israel, so Joshua and the Israelites defeated them completely at Gibeon. Israel pursued them along the road going up to Beth Horon and cut them down all the way to Azekah and Makkedah. 11 As they fled before Israel on the road down from Beth Horon to Azekah, the Lord hurled large hailstones down on them, and more of them died from the hail than were killed by the swords of the Israelites.

12 On the day the Lord gave the Amorites over to Israel, Joshua said to the Lord in the presence of Israel:

“Sun, stand still over Gibeon, and you, moon, over the Valley of Aijalon.”

13 So the sun stood still, and the moon stopped, till the nation avenged itself on its enemies, as it is written in the Book of Jashar. The sun stopped in the middle of the sky and delayed going down about a full day. 14 There has never been a day like it before or since, a day when the Lord listened to a human being. Surely the Lord was fighting for Israel!

15 Then Joshua returned with all Israel to the camp at Gilgal.

And just like that good ol sensible Yahoshua gets transformed into Yahoshua, the man who told the Lord to make the sun and the moon stand still and God heeded his words, and gave His permission to allow it to happen. Something like that had never happened before—not even with Abraham and Moshe and David. And it never happened again after that—not even with Daanyel, who was greatly beloved.

There has never been a day like it before or since, a day when the Lord listened to a human being. Surely the Lord was fighting for Israel!

Using this as a reset button, now think or rather rethink about Yahoshua or Joshua (I prefer to use the names the way we say them in our native tongue, Marathi, which, I am told are close to the Hebrew pronunciations). You will find Yahoshua’s run unblemished except for that minor incident when the Gibeonites deceived the Israelites into a treaty of peace with them, to let them live, a treaty made by Yahoshua without consulting with God. That too did not hurt Israel.

Yahoshua’s strength? Total, uncompromising obedience to God. And God loved him for it.

Our obedience to Yahowah is sweet to Him. He prizes it more than the sacrifices of rams, bulls, and doves on altars. May our obedience to Him and our love for Him be pleasing in His eyes.

Shalom.


Leave a comment

Monotheism and the Triune God – Final Part.

In conclusion of this series of posts, let’s try and understand the general beliefs of the church fathers and doctors. Their contributions are either refinement of existent theology or the introduction of new concepts. What is worth noticing is that they all, without exception, were ascetics. Asceticism springs out of the Gnostic system of beliefs. Gnosticism believes that the goal of a man’s life is to move through various spheres, from material to spiritual, to finally reunite with God. The less you remain involved with the material, the less distracted you are to move along your journey.

Read about Gnosticism here and here.

The early “Catholic” church has church fathers and church doctors. The main difference between the two was that the church fathers are considered as testifying to the truths and teachings of the early church members, including those of the apostles. This made them either close to the apostles, or hearers of the disciples or at least active around the same time as the apostles in different geographies. You further have pre-Nicene church fathers, whose beliefs have not departed from what Christ and apostles taught; and the ante-Nicene church fathers.

Doctors of the church are people who were chosen because “their teachings explain and clarify doctrines of the church so well, or in such a new way that it helps the understanding of our faith.” Unlike fathers, doctors are not restricted by time and can continue to be chosen even today, with of course the all-important nod from the papacy. These were the church doctors and fathers.

The problem with the ante-Nicene church fathers was that a lot of them were also students of, dabbled in, or at least were interested in, Hellenistic philosophy, alchemy, and Gnosticism. That being their interest and leaning, they kind of tried to explain Christianity and its mysteries through philosophy. Some of them even mingled external learnings or points of view with Christian theology leading to a syncretizing, a departure from pure faith. This needlessly complicated things. Christianity is enough as it is given in the Bible. We do not need any further appendices to it, especially not ones that have taken help from non-Christian sources. If there is anything in the Bible that is not explained beyond a para then chances are that you do not need to know it. If you want to know something or there is something that you are struggling to understand, ask God about it and He will show you through the Holy Spirit.

A lot of this deep theorising and study, if you notice, is rather empty. It is vainglorious as its end is not really to convey the love of God or move people to a deeper understanding of His nature or His plan or His future for us. Rather, it busies itself with the clinical dissection of God’s Word, of things that are not really all that important or not mentioned in the Bible, a sort of idle exploration of things that are superfluous to Christian living and done for the sake of itself. Some of them put forward theories that chaff against the truths mentioned in the Bible. One such example is Cyprian’s teaching that the Church was both founded and intended by Christ as a necessary means of salvation. (Source: https://msgrpope.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/CYPRIAN5.pdf). You don’t need the Church for salvation. Churches help with the spreading of the Gospel and give new Christians a likeminded family to belong to, which edifies them and strengthens them in their walk.

Thus, while all the theories and philosophical exploration of the Bible did not change what is written in it, it did affect the beliefs and led to practices that were not entirely in line with Christian teachings; in some cases, they were actually borrowed from pagan beliefs.

There are too many church fathers and doctors to cover here with any kind of seriousness or depth. What I plan to do instead is write out separate posts on each of them and expose those of their doctrines that are incongruous with what the Bible says. And then you decide how many current Christian beliefs come out of the Bible and how many have been brought in from outside.

This concludes this series of posts. I sincerely hope that you will read through all the posts in this series. The aim is for you to not only clear the misconception about trinity but to also point to the other not so acceptable beliefs that are being passed off as mainstream Christian beliefs, when in fact they are not.

Shalome


Leave a comment

Monotheism and the Concept of a Triune God – Part 5

As promised, here is the new theology introduced by the Catholic Church and how it is in error vis a vis the Word of God. This post is long but there were no shortcuts I could take. Though, I have written a lot less briefly than I really wanted to. I’ve provided a list of links at the end for those who want to know more.

First Council of Nicaea

The date for the celebration of Resurrection Day was set to a Sunday before the Equinox. This was because some Christians believed that the Jewish computation of the calendar was wrong or had gone wrong. Thus, Easter was separated from Passover and was fixed for “the first Sunday after the first Full Moon occurring on or after the March equinox.”

Error: The crucifixion and resurrection of Christ were not random. Yeshua was crucified on the eve of Passover and as He predicted, He came back to life on the third day from that date of the crucifixion. He was meant to be sacrificed at the exact right time–prior to a festival that has such life-saving significance. The Passover Lamb was to be slain and the blood was to be put on the doorpost so that death would not touch that household. Exactly what Christ’s death on the cross was to accomplish–salvation from eternal death. There was significance, and there was a connection in the choice of the time of His crucifixion. By separating this event from the very festival whose plan Christ was supposed to fulfill, the Roman Catholic Church took things into their own hands. The Jews may or may not have erred in the calculation of their calendar, but the date chosen by the Roman Catholic Church for celebrating Resurrection is not only lacking in any significance but is also, again, not the right date. What did the Church achieve by this? Nothing.

Council of Constantinople

The Trinity as a concept and belief is officially accepted.

Error: As I have mentioned in the last few posts, the concept of Trinity is not mentioned anywhere in the Bible. As is clear from the record of events of the various Ecumenical Councils, this concept was adopted much later on and seems to be based on the pagan/esoteric beliefs of the people who introduced it. It has nothing to do with Christianity. A friend’s fiance, surprisingly Roman Catholic himself, explained the relationship of Yahowah, Yeshua, and Holy Spirit in a very simple manner. If we place a cube of ice on a table at room temperature what do you observe? The ice melts slowly, leaving a puddle of water on the table. Simultaneously, we see vapour rising out of the cube. So, we see water in three forms at the same time–solid ice, water, and vapour. They all have the same formula–H2O. But we see them in 3 different forms, each having a different state and name. That is the connection and reality of Yahowah, Yeshua, and the Holy Spirit. There is no Trinity. It is One God–Yahowah Echad.

The First Council of Ephesus

Virgin Mary was to be called Theotokos (God-bearer or the one who gave birth to God.)

Error: Mary was chosen among the Jewish women of that age to give birth to Yeshua. Christ needed to come in the human form in order to:

  1. Be sacrificed: No one could even see the face of the Holy Ancient of Days, Yahowah, let alone touch Him. He is indestructible, Alpha and Omega, having no beginning and no end. An indestructible God cannot be sacrificed. And yet, the law required the shedding of pure blood for the forgiveness of sin and for salvation. The only way God could do this for His people was to take on a body that could be destroyed. From the Old Testament we see that while God could not be seen in His glorious form by even Moshe, he did appear in another one when speaking to His people–as the Angel of God. So, this was not some blasphemous concept invented by Christianity.
  2. Shed blood: According to the ordinances, shedding of pure and innocent blood was required for the forgiveness of sins. This worked along substitutional lines–some innocent being’s life in exchange for yours. God’s states that “every soul that sins, dies.” That is non-negotiable. But His mercy did negotiate an arrangement wherein our sins would be transferred onto someone sinless and their sinlessness would be transferred to us through sacrifice. It was a testimony of how advanced humans were as sinners that the only ones sinless and pure among us were animals. And yet our lives were more precious in God’s eyes because we have souls that are eternal, whereas animals do not. Sacrificing of innocent animals was supposed to bring about a sense of remorse and repentance in us, triggering a change of heart. But human beings became so hard-hearted that instead of being saddened by our ways that took someone else’s life, we started taking that sacrifice for granted. It lost its purpose: life-changing repentance, softening of the heart, the invoking of a sense of justice. Which is why the plan called Yeshua. Once, and for all.

The big thing was always Yeshua. Mary was just a chosen vehicle to bring Him into the world. Admittedly she was very righteous and she would be a very good role model for Jewish and Christian women to study and emulate, but she did not have an “immaculate conception” herself. Nor was she ever raised from her grave. To put her on a pedestal like Roman Catholicism does is actually the adoption of a favorite pagan concept of a Mother Goddess or the Female Power. More specifically, the ancient female deity who went by different names different regions–Ashtoreth in Canaan, Ishtar of Babylon, Dushara of Phoenicia, and Allat and Lato of Greece and Rome.

Second Council of Nicea

Byzantine Iconoclasm, which opposed all use of religious images and icons for worship, was rejected at the council. The Council decreed that altars must have a relic.

Error: It is amazing that a concept that was in line with Judeo-Christian faith was rejected by the council! The second of the 10 commandments states that we should not make any images of anything or anyone and bow before them or pray to them. And then here we see the council denouncing Byzantine Iconoclasm for obeying that commandment! How messed is that? Judaism as well as Christianity, do not allow the creation, use, or worship of any relics, graven images, crosses, photographs, body parts, pieces of clothing and personal objects of saints. It is strictly forbidden.

First Council of Lateran

Clerical celibacy – The requirement that some or all members of the clergy in certain religions be unmarried. Celibacy of the clergy was ordered by Canon Law issued by the First Council of the Lateran.

Error: Marriage is the most natural requirement laid down by God. That is why God made Eve out of Adam. So he’d have a companion, a helper, a confidante through good and bad times. Marriage was supposed to build and increase the human race, also spread the seed so it was numerous in line with God’s plan. None of the Old Testament patriarchs were celibate because it went against God’s plan. In the New Testament, Yeshua was celibate, but His life had a different plan that did not include creating a line of descendants. In Matthew 19, He did talk about marriage and divorce, but to His disciples’ statement that it was better to not marry, He goes on to say that singlehood is not for everyone, only those who can accept it are called to it. To make it mandatory goes against the freedom that God and His Christ have given us. The pervasive sex abuse perpetrated by Roman Catholic clergy is proof that this particular mandate has proved to be anti-nature, anti-God’s plan, devastating to the victims and all-round harmful for the Christian faith.

Fourth Council of Lateran

Transubstantiation – The doctrine that, in the Eucharist, the substance of wheat bread and grape wine changes into the substance of the Body and the Blood of Jesus. Literally. The Fourth Council of the Lateran defined this doctrine.

Error: It is just bread and wine. It is supposed to be allegorical, not literal. And it is supposed to be done in remembrance of Yeshua’s sacrifice every time believers meet. Every time. Not only on Sundays, as is currently in vogue for convenience reasons! Neither Christ nor the New Testament mentions the concept of Transubstantiation.

Papal primacy – Ecclesiastical doctrine concerning the respect and authority that is due to the Bishop of Rome from other bishops and their sees. The Fourth Council of the Lateran declared this doctrine.

Error: Based on this principle, Peter should have been the first Pope. However, he was not. He was an apostle like every other apostle. And he took decisions in consultation with the other apostles. Not only that, when Paul set up various churches in far-flung regions of Asia Minor, each had it’s own head and autonomy in day-to-day operations. The use of the Church and religion for administrative purposes was a terrible invention of the Roman Catholic Church.

Confession – Acknowledgment of sin (or one’s sinfulness) or wrongs. The Fourth Council of the Lateran declared that every Christian must perform confession at least once a year.

Error: God has never set a specific day or time for confessions of sins. The minute you become aware of having sinned, confess it, repent, and put in all your effort into not repeating it. It can be before others, but that’s not necessary. It certainly does not have to be only to a man sitting in a wooden cubicle in a church.

Communion – Christian sacrament or ordinance. The Fourth Council of the Lateran declared that every Christian must take communion at least once a year.

Error: Christ told His disciples to ‘take this wine and bread in my remembrance whenever you meet.’ Not just once a week, not just once a year, but whenever people meet. Protestants, as well as Catholics, err when they relegate breaking bread and having wine to only certain days.

Fifth Council of Lateran

Immortality_of_the_soul – Souls temporarily stay in purgatory to be purified for heaven.

Error: Purgatory is a common, and heartening, pagan concept. However, it is simply not true. We have one life–the one we live on Earth.  This is the testing ground, this is the decision-making period, this is where you have a chance. Most importantly, here is where you attain salvation through belief in Christ’s sacrifice, and that will determine whether or not your soul survives the second death and goes on to live eternally. Purgatory is just a happy ending story made up by men to excuse the terrible way they live their lives, and for grieving relatives to feel comforted that they can help their loved one get an assured place in heaven, where they can all be united. However, the concept and practice have no validation in the Bible.

Council of Trent

Protestantism – One of the major groupings within Christianity. It has been defined as “any of several church denominations denying the universal authority of the Pope and affirming the Reformation principles of justification by faith alone, the priesthood of all believers, and the primacy of the Bible as the only source of revealed truth” and, more broadly, to mean Christianity outside “of a Catholic or Eastern church”. This set of beliefs was condemned by the Council of Trent.

Error: So basically, give primacy to the Catholic or Eastern Church over God, doesn’t matter if they are in error, doesn’t matter how corrupt they are, doesn’t matter that they are blatantly breaking His given laws, doesn’t matter that they have mixed paganism with His pure faith. A church that cannot manage its own ministers and priests from sexually abusing little children. Christianity and Judaism have always been about following God’s Word through His book. In fact, in Corinthians 14, Paul mentions that when people gathered for worship, a few prophets should speak as inspired by the Holy Spirit and the rest of the congregation should weigh carefully what is said. According to the Cambridge Dictionary, to weigh means “to carefully consider, especially by comparing facts or possibilities, in order to make a decision.” Clearly, Paul is saying that the congregation has the responsibility to gauge if what is spoken is right by the word of God. To place the pope, priests, elders, and ministers in churches above God’s Word is just wrong.

Indulgences – Indulgence is the full or partial remission of temporal punishment due for sins which have already been forgiven. The Council of Trent curtailed and restricted how they are issued. But they were not demolished.

Error: I don’t even know what to say about this.

Sola Fide – Protestant doctrine of “faith alone.” The Council of Trent rejected this doctrine as “vain confid ence.”

Error: In Catholicism, Canon4 says: If any one faith saith, that the sacraments of the New Law are not necessary unto salvation, but superfluous; and that, without them, or without the desire thereof, men obtain of God, through faith alone, the grace of justification-though all sacraments are not indeed necessary for every individual; let him be anathema. The 7 sacraments are baptism, eucharist, confirmation, reconciliation, anointing of the sick, marriage, and holy orders. “The (catholic) Church affirms that for believers the sacraments of the New Covenant are necessary for salvation.” (Source: Wikipedia). Anyone notice that faith in Christ’s sacrifice on the cross is NOT one of the 7 sacraments? The most important thing, upon which the entire New Testament is based, is not one of the sacraments that are “necessary for salvation.” Just, wow! No wonder, the Catholic Church is against Sola Fide. The power to save lives is taken away from the works of man and is placed back in Christ’s saving work on the cross.

Canon of Trent – It was confirmed that the deuterocanonical books were on a par with the other books of the canon; ended debate on the Antilegomena; coordinated church tradition with the Scriptures as a rule of faith. It also affirmed Jerome’s Latin translation, the Vulgate, to be authoritative for the text of Scripture.

Error: Deuterocanonical books were given the same importance as the canonical ones, including the ones of the Old Testament, which is the Jewish Tanach.

Sacraments – Sacred rite recognized as of particular importance and significance; the Council of Trent reaffirmed seven sacraments.

Error: Canon 4 says: If any one saith, that the sacraments of the New Law are not necessary unto salvation, but superfluous; and that, without them, or without the desire thereof, men obtain of God, through faith alone, the grace of justification;-though all (the sacraments) are not indeed necessary for every individual; let him be anathema. Only belief in Christ’s sacrifice on the cross is necessary for salvation, an inward acceptance that has to be sealed by the outward ritual of Baptism by immersion, after which Christians should consume the bread and wine in remembrance of Yeshua. That’s all.

Purgatory – The condition of purification or temporary punishment by which those who die in a state of grace are believed to be made ready for Heaven. The Council of Trent affirmed this doctrine.

I have already written about this earlier.

First Council of the Vatican

Papal infallibility – Dogma of the Catholic Church which states that, by action of the Holy Spirit, the Pope is preserved from even the possibility of error when in his official capacity he solemnly declares or promulgates to the universal Church a dogmatic teaching on faith or morals.

Error: Protestants do not even have this joke of a concept, but even by Catholic standards, Pope Leo X who “gave indulgences in return for donations to build a basilica” was in error. So much for Papal infallibility.

Dei Filius – Teaching of “the holy Catholic Apostolic Roman Church” on God, revelation and faith.

Error: Even the apostles, the men who knew Christ and were personally chosen by Him, who performed miracles and wonders like Him, did not dare to exalt themselves to the place of Vicar, meaning representative of Christ on Earth, the title that was assumed by the Pope. Christ was very clear about Who He would send in His place after He ascended. John 14:26 declares, “But the Counselor, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in my name, will teach you all things and will remind you of everything I have said to you.” John 14:16-18 proclaims, “And I will ask the Father, and He will give you another Counselor to be with you forever — the Spirit of truth. The world cannot accept Him, because it neither sees Him nor knows Him. But you know Him, for He lives with you and will be in you. I will not leave you as orphans; I will come to you.” The Holy Spirit is Christ’s “replacement” on the earth. The Holy Spirit is our Counselor, Teacher (John 14:26), and guide into all truth (John 16:13). (Source: GotQuestons.org)

The Roman Catholic church openly admits to the practice of Inculturation in order to create a smooth transition for people of an indigenous culture to Christianity. This involves incorporating some elements of the indigenous culture into Christianity in order to make it more palatable and acceptable to the people of the land. That is probably how pagan practices were added to Christianity and given the outer accouterments of Christianity and justified as “any means to get as many to Christ as possible.” But Christ never asked them to do this. In fact, Christians are not even supposed to pull out all stops in their attempts to convert people to Christianity. That, however, is another post.

The Roman Catholic Church has adulterated the teachings of the original church, bringing in pagan concepts, creating its own traditions that did not match the rules laid down by Christ and Yahowah. They are the tares planted by the enemy in that parable Christ narrated. They are here now and He has allowed them to remain till the final day when their works will be tested by fire.

They are by no means the face of Christianity, neither are their beliefs and practices those of all Christians.

In the next post, and in conclusion of this series, we will briefly look at the Church fathers and the basic school of belief that they operated from.

Shalome.

 


Leave a comment

Monotheism and the Concept of a Triune God – Part 4

The Christian faith shown in the Bible, as founded by Christ and as followed by the Apostles was strongly based on the Old Testament, that is, the Tanach of the Jewish people. Like Judaism, it frowned on idolatry, pantheons of Gods, and worship of people or saints.

Judaism has a very clear outline contributed to by strict laws and very specific directions given by Moses. If you were to follow Judaism based on the Tanach, you will never be in violation of the faith. In spite of all this clarity, however, the Israelites routinely indulged in idolatry–something strictly forbidden in Judaism. Similarly, Christianity has a very clear set of rules that are based on Old Testament beliefs and laws, and on Christ’s teachings. If people follow the book, there is no way you can go wrong in the faith.

So where did error come in? Because some of the current Christian beliefs are definitely in violation of the original faith. The answer lies in Christian history, specifically at the juncture where Constantine arrived on the rather tortured Christian scene of that age. And the modifications that occurred in the faith over time based on the reasoning of the early Church father, doctors and elders.

Emperor Constantine

He was considered the person who gave Christianity legitimacy, saving it from being a tortured band of followers and making it an official religion. He stopped the persecution of the fledgling Christian church and went to the point of making it one of the accepted religions of his empire.

The story of the point of conversion of Constantine is all too famous:

“Eusebius of Caesarea and other Christian sources record that Constantine experienced a dramatic event in 312 at the Battle of the Milvian Bridge, after which Constantine claimed the emperorship in the West. According to these sources, Constantine looked up to the sun before the battle and saw a cross of light above it, and with it the Greek words “Ἐν Τούτῳ Νίκα” (in this sign, conquer), often rendered in a Latin version, in hoc signo vinces (in this sign, you will conquer). Constantine commanded his troops to adorn their shields with a Christian symbol (the Chi-Rho), and thereafter they were victorious.” (Source: Wikipedia). You can read about Constantine’s Christian efforts here.

That one single event at the Battle of Milvian Bridge led to a series of actions and activities that saved Christianity in the immediate future, but in the long run, adulterated it with teachings that did not have any place in the faith.

Historians and theologians are divided about Constantine’s true religious beliefs and commitment to Christianity. Some say he juggled both the original pagan Roman religion with the newer Christianity, getting baptized only on his deathbed. Others believe that Constantine, considered the saviour of the persecuted Christian church, organized the breaking down of pagan places of worship and introduced various reforms and laws for the propagation of Christianity.

History does not offer any clarity on this matter.

Constantine started the tradition of the Ecumenical Councils–gatherings of Christian clergy and the Emperor to discuss and settle various matters related to Christian dogma, beliefs, debates as well as to consolidate the Nicene Creed. These Ecumenical Councils saw the introduction of the beliefs that are now the beliefs and practices of the Roman Catholic Church and the Eastern Orthodox Church (Catholic), but not of Protestant Christianity. In fact, most of these new introductions are considered heretical by Protestant Christians.

Let’s take a quick look at how the Ecumenical Councils introduced error. You can read the about outline of the Ecumenical Councils here.

First Council of Nicaea

The date for the celebration of Resurrection Day was set to a Sunday before the Equinox. This was because some Christians believed that the Jewish computation of the calendar was wrong or had gone wrong. Thus, Easter was separated from Passover.

Council of Constantinople

The Trinity as a concept and belief is officially accepted.

The First Council of Ephesus

Virgin Mary was to be called Theotokos (God-bearer or the one who gave birth to God.)

Second Council of Nicea

Byzantine Iconoclasm, which opposed all use of religious images and icons for worship, was rejected at the council. The Council decreed that altars must have a relic.

First Council of Lateran

Clerical celibacy – The requirement that some or all members of the clergy in certain religions be unmarried. Celibacy of the clergy was ordered by Canon Law issued by the First Council of the Lateran.

Fourth Council of Lateran

Transubstantiation – The doctrine that, in the Eucharist, the substance of wheat bread and grape wine changes into the substance of the Body and the Blood of Jesus. Literally. The Fourth Council of the Lateran defined this doctrine.

Papal primacy – Ecclesiastical doctrine concerning the respect and authority that is due to the Bishop of Rome from other bishops and their sees. The Fourth Council of the Lateran declared this doctrine.

Confession – Acknowledgment of sin (or one’s sinfulness) or wrongs. The Fourth Council of the Lateran declared that every Christian must perform confession at least once a year.

Communion – Christian sacrament or ordinance. The Fourth Council of the Lateran declared that every Christian must take communion at least once a year.

Fifth Council of Lateran

Immortality_of_the_soul – Souls temporarily stay in purgatory to be purified for heaven.

Council of Trent

Protestantism – One of the major groupings within Christianity. It has been defined as “any of several church denominations denying the universal authority of the Pope and affirming the Reformation principles of justification by faith alone, the priesthood of all believers, and the primacy of the Bible as the only source of revealed truth” and, more broadly, to mean Christianity outside “of a Catholic or Eastern church”. This set of beliefs was condemned by the Council of Trent.

Indulgences – Indulgence is the full or partial remission of temporal punishment due for sins which have already been forgiven. The Council of Trent curtailed and restricted how they are issued. But they were not demolished.

Sola fide – Protestant doctrine of “faith alone.” The Council of Trent rejected this doctrine as “vain confidence.”

Canon of Trent – It was confirmed that the deuterocanonical books were on a par with the other books of the canon; ended debate on the Antilegomena; coordinated church tradition with the Scriptures as a rule of faith. It also affirmed Jerome’s Latin translation, the Vulgate, to be authoritative for the text of Scripture

Sacraments – Sacred rite recognized as of particular importance and significance; the Council of Trent reaffirmed seven sacraments.

Purgatory – The condition of purification or temporary punishment by which those who die in a state of grace are believed to be made ready for Heaven. The Council of Trent affirmed this doctrine.

First Council of the Vatican

Papal infallibility – Dogma of the Catholic Church which states that, by action of the Holy Spirit, the Pope is preserved from even the possibility of error when in his official capacity he solemnly declares or promulgates to the universal Church a dogmatic teaching on faith or morals.

Dei Filius – Teaching of “the holy Catholic Apostolic Roman Church” on God, revelation and faith.

All of these introductions, not part of the original set of laws, beliefs, and behaviours of the pre-Nicene, Apostolic Christian Church, muddied the original faith as taught by Christ.

In the next post, I will break down how each of these introductions violated Christian principles and beliefs. You will then be able to fully comprehend the heresy called the Roman Catholic Church.

Shalome.

For an in-depth history and background of the false Trinity doctrine read:  http://www.trinitytruth.org/paganoriginsofthetrinity.html

 


Leave a comment

Monotheism and the Concept of A Triune God – Part 3

Let’s begin with a simple fact: the word trinity, triad or triune simply does not exist in the Bible. You can deduce that the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit are in agreement, are one in three forms or even using the very simple” if A=B and B=C then A=C” reasoning. But at no point and in no verse does the New Testament mention the word trinity. In contrast, several ancient pagan writings very openly mention trinity with regard to their gods. Some of these religions also had the concept of more than three gods united as one, but we are primarily concerned with Christianity and Judaism, so we will restrict our research and writing to the triad or the trinity. Read this article to understand how various ancient religions have had the trinity of gods.

https://www.ucg.org/bible-study-tools/booklets/is-god-a-trinity/how-ancient-trinitarian-gods-influenced-adoption-of-the

What’s interesting is that the early church did not have any such “trinitarian” beliefs. The concept of trinity was formally adopted and was accepted as a belief at one of the Ecumenical Councils organised by Emperor Constantine to regulate and formalize Christianity. The reason this concept is not found written in the Bible is because at the councils, the attendees never wrote any new books neither did they make any additions based on their decisions, but simply collated and selected from the writings and books that were already in circulation among the early Christians. This meant that the books written by the early Christians–Jewish converts, Gentiles who had been taught by the apostles–were among the books they all deliberated upon. Since these books do not have the word trinity mentioned, it is safe to say that the earliest Christians had not coined the word.

Of course, it was not all as easy as that. The fact that one of the tasks of the councils was to weed the spurious from the real writings itself meant that there were many heretical texts in circulation at that time, and the Christian community was divided over doctrine. However, trinity was still not introduced via the texts in circulation–genuine or heretical.

So, if the trinity concept was not taught by the early converts, where did it come from and how did it enter Christianity? To understand this, you have to understand church history because the answers are embedded in it.

The church we know today is not the church that Peter and the apostles nurtured and grew. That church comprised mainly of Jewish and Gentile converts. All the apostles were Jewish and hence they were well versed with Jewish customs and laws. Most importantly, they had known Christ when He lived among them. They had heard Him preach and knew His teachings and beliefs. And they had been with Christ when He said: Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. (Matthew 5: 17). To them had been revealed the explanation of the knowledge that was always present from the Old Testament onward. They knew Yahowah, they kept His Sabbath and the law, they understood who Christ was and they had been anointed by the Holy Spirit. The early pre-Nicene church had been taught by these men, and they had  their principles down pat. However, even in those days, heresies had already begun to appear, and they have been warned about by the apostles in their letters.

This church had been the recipient of Rabbinical ire from the time of Christ, but now it was also the target of Roman persecution. History speaks plainly of the works of the tetrarchs of Rome and their anti-Christian policies. In short, as history tells us, the early pre-Nicene church was a deeply troubled and persecuted one. But it had its principles right for the most part and about the most important things. For instance, the early church kept the Sabbath, something that the Christian world today refuses to do.

While they were in this state of persecution, Constantine entered the scenario. It is difficult to verify to what degree his claims of the vision he saw  were true and to what degree, the stratagem of an astute and ambitious mind.  After all, Constantine did not rule from Rome but preferred to set up his distinct kingdom in Macedonia, a departure from the earlier rulers. It was here, in his kingdom and under his rule, that Christianity found legitimacy and relief. In the sanction afforded to it, the new fledgling faith breathed easy.

The recognition that a monarch bestowed upon a new religion made the world’s intelligentsia, particularly from the Hellenistic world, take notice. The curiosity of the learned and the learners was aroused and many started reading about Christianity, perhaps for the first time as a religion and not some heretical sect. These learned men, many of them also deeply interested in philosophy, alchemy, Gnosticism, other religions and sects, cast their own influence on Christianity. One such man was Tertullian. Though not an early Church father, was a Christian writer who coined the word “trinity” long before it was introduced at the Ecumenical Councils. The word itself was coined through the influence and application of Stoic philosophy and the concept was further refined and clarified when Tertullian became a Montanist.

We’ll look at how the combined influences of Constantine and early Church writers and fathers altered the personality of Christianity that was introduced by Christ and the apostles. In the next part, we’ll concentrate on Constantine and his move to legitimize Christianity.

Shalome


Leave a comment

Monotheism and the Concept of a Triune God – Part 2

This is a continuation of a topic that was started  in this post. Read it to get a background and to understand the reference in this post.

Christians have been accused of splitting God into three. In the last post, I tried to explain the concept of a triune God. How He is essentially One God, visible in three forms to serve three separate purposes. Yahowah is purity and reading the Old Testament reveals His attributes as a pure and just God. Yahshua is love and salvation. The New testament reveals that God has always loved us richly, passionately and deeply, but through Yahshua’s sacrifice, He takes that love to the next level, making it stronger than even pain and death, achieving salvation for all who will believe. It’s the deepest love we will ever encounter on earth and in this life, lovers and husbands/wives and parents notwithstanding. And the Holy Spirit indwelling in us, purifies us much as a refiner refines silver. He works with us slowly, steadily, improving us, convicting us of wrongdoing but never condemning us, encouraging us to get up and try again. When Yahshua said, I will leave you a Comforter, He meant it.

But God in three forms, is it some New Testament invention? That God appears in a physical form and a spirit form as well as His glorious one, is it something we Christians have imported into the original faith from paganism? Take this small Old testament tour with me to know, not through my knowledge or my reasoning, but through the simple and clearly stated information given in the Word of God.

Yahowah–Almighty God, the Great I am, the Ancient of Days.

When Moses saw the burning bush on Mount Horeb, he wondered at how the bush was on fire but did not burn up. His curiosity brought him into his first encounter with God. The first thing God asked Moses to do was remove his sandals, for Moses stood on holy ground. At that point, Yahowah introduced Himself by name as I am Who I am (Exodus 3:14.) Moses went on to lead the Israelites out of Egypt, but throughout that journey he kept in close communion with God, who directed him. When Moses wanted to see His glory, Yahowah told Moses: No man can see my glory and live (Exodus 33:20.) There is a place near me where you may stand on a rock. 22 When my glory passes by, I will put you in a cleft in the rock and cover you with my hand until I have passed by. 23 Then I will remove my hand and you will see my back; but my face must not be seen (Exodus 33:20-23.)  When God descended on mountains before the Israelites, the mountain was always covered with clouds, so the Israelites could see lightening and could hear his voice but could not see him. Deuteronomy 4: 11-14: You came near and stood at the foot of the mountain while it blazed with fire to the very heavens, with black clouds and deep darkness. 12 Then the Lord spoke to you out of the fire. You heard the sound of words but saw no form; there was only a voice.   Deuteronomy  5: 15You saw no form of any kind the day the Lord spoke to you at Horeb out of the fire. Therefore watch yourselves very carefully. No one has seen the face of Yahowah, so when John says: No one has seen the face of God and lived, he is right. However, a supposed contradiction arises when we consider Exodus 33:11 that states that: 11 The Lord would speak to Moses face to face, as one speaks to a friend. But is it really a contradiction? Let’s look at the next point.

The Angel of the Lord

The first few books of the old testament has several references to the  angel of the Lord.

  1. Genesis 16: The account of Hagar and Ishmael.
  2. Genesis 22: The angel of the Lord speaks to Abraham as he is about to sacrifice Issac: But the angel of the Lord called out to him from heaven,“Abraham! Abraham!”“Here I am,” he replied.12 “Do not lay a hand on the boy,” he said. “Do not do anything to him. Now I know that you fear God, because you have not withheld from me your son, your only son.”

Genesis 18: The Lord appears to Abraham at Mamre in the form of a man:

18 The Lord appeared to Abraham near the great trees of Mamre while he was sitting at the entrance to his tent in the heat of the day. Abraham looked up and saw three men standing nearby. When he saw them, he hurried from the entrance of his tent to meet them and bowed low to the ground.

Genesis 32: 22-30: In This passage, Jacob wrestles with a man all night and prevails. At the end of their conversation, Jacob names the place where it happened Peniel, which means: It is because I saw God face to face, and yet my life was spared.” 

Exodus 3: 1-6: In this passage, the angel of the Lord, as well as God, appears to Moses from within a burning bush.

There the angel of the Lord appeared to him in flames of fire from within a bush. Moses saw that though the bush was on fire it did not burn up. So Moses thought, “I will go over and see this strange sight—why the bush does not burn up.”

When the Lord saw that he had gone over to look, God called to him from within the bush, “Moses! Moses!”

And Moses said, “Here I am.”

“Do not come any closer,” God said. “Take off your sandals, for the place where you are standing is holy ground.” Then he said, “I am the God of your father,[a] the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac and the God of Jacob.” At this, Moses hid his face, because he was afraid to look at God.

Judges 13: This passage is about the angel of the Lord appearing to Manoah and his wife to instruct them about the son they were about to have.  At the end of their communication, Manoah’s wife realizes they have seen God.

Judges 6: 11-24: In this passage, Gideon sees the angel of the Lord and on realizing who he had seen, he is afraid he will die. There was no need for this fear if it was a mere angel. After all, Daniel met Gabriel but he never felt that fear.

In each of these references we see that the angel of the Lord was not initially recognized by the people who saw Him, but when they did, they realized they had seen God face-to-face. All of these would be in contradiction to the Exodus 33: 20. If. that is. we do not make space for the fact that God, even in those days, appeared to man in a different form, one that allowed Him to communicate with them but one that did not, at the same time, harm them.

And was this angel of the Lord himself God? Judges 2: The angel of the Lord went up from Gilgal to Bokim and said, “I brought you up out of Egypt and led you into the land I swore to give to your ancestors. I said, ‘I will never break my covenant with you, and you shall not make a covenant with the people of this land, but you shall break down their altars.’ Yet you have disobeyed me. Why have you done this? And I have also said, ‘I will not drive them out before you; they will become traps for you, and their gods will become snares to you.’”

Even a casual study of the Pentateuch will tell you that:

  1. It was Yahowah who brought Israel out of Egypt.
  2.  It was Yahowah who led the Israelites through the wilderness into the land that He had promised them.
  3. It was Yahowah who had promised the land of Canaan to Israel’s ancestors.
  4. It was Yahowah who had made a covenant with Israel, which He said He would never break.
  5. It was Yahowah who had instructed Israel about what they should do with the pagan deities and places of worship as they encountered then during their slow and steady occupation.
  6.  And it was Yahowah who went ahead of the Israelites in battle and who gave them victory.

Here, in this verse, it is the angel of the Lord who makes the same claims as Yahowah, clearly showing us that He and Yahowah are one and the same, just appearing in two different forms.

The Spirit of God

The Holy Spirit of God had been poured out or put into various people in the old testament–from artisans who were commissioned to build the temple, to musicians, to the leaders who had been chosen to govern and guide Israelites during their desert years.

Numbers 11: The Spirit of God was poured out on 70 elders chosen by Moses. They immediately prophesied when the Spirit descended on them.

Exodus 31: God chose Bezalel and Ohaliab to work on the design of the Tent of Meeting etc.

These verse are not written by Christians; they existed from of old. They show us that God could and did exist in three forms from the beginning–as the pure and glorious Yahowah who man cannot see and live. As the angel of God who visited people and spoke to them face-to-face, giving them instructions. And as the Holy Spirit who descended on people selected to carry out tasks so that they would be guided to do them in a way that was aligned with the will of Adonai.

From the Old Testament, the Jewish Tanach, to the New Testament, we see that the one and only God has has existed in three forms to serve differing purposes. The New testament has not imported anything from any pagan belief systems.

In the next post in this topic, I would like to discuss the concept of Trinity, how it is confused with what is the truth existing in the Bible ( and the Tanach) and also how it distorts this truth.

Shalome.


Leave a comment

Monotheism and the Concept of a Triune God – Part 1

Jews, in all probability, smirk at Christians when we refer to Yahshua as God. It’s not surprising because, as I said, Judaism is a strictly monotheistic faith.

So, when Christians speak of Yahshua as God, I am sure two problems arise in the mind of the Jew:

  1. He was a man, for God’s sake! How can a man be made into a God without the whole thing being heretical?
  2. If God is the Father then how can there be God the Son and then God the Holy Spirit also? What confusion and, hence, what balderdash!

When I lived in Bangalore, my room mate and I turned this puzzle over in our heads, talking about it, trying to figure out the concept of a triune God. The one thing that always got in the way of understanding it was our fixed way of understanding the world, based as it was, in this case, on physical reality. For me, my father will be a different physical entity and I will be a different one. We may share the same family name but we are not one.

Let’s check the reality of the Bible. God existing in three different forms is visible at the event of the baptism of Christ found in the New Testament in Matthew 3: 13-17. One was that of the Father Who spoke from heaven and said: This is My beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased (Verse 17).  The second was that of the Son–Yahshua–who was being baptized (Verse 16); and the third was that of the Holy Spirit of God, which descended from heaven on Christ in the form of a dove (Verse 16). Clearly, three separate physical forms, in one place. So how do we reconcile that with One God? We turned that over and over in our heads.

And then someone explained the concept to us so simply that we felt a little foolish for not having have thought of it ourselves. In a simple analogy, the concept of a triune God can be understood by looking at a melting ice cube. The ice is solid. As it melts, the same ice turns into water. And as it turns liquid, it also gives off vapour. It’s the same arrangement of molecules H2O, visible in three different forms right in front of your eyes–solid, liquid and vapour. And though we see three forms, the water and the vapour issue forth out of the ice. That’s how triune would work in the physical world.

Here’s what I think. God took on three forms because each served a specific purpose that the others could not. The Father Yahowah cannot be destroyed (Job 36:26, Psalm 102: 12 and 90:2Isaiah 40:28, Hebrew 1: 11-12) or even approached by sinful people, so holy is He (Exodus 19:11-13, Exodus 33: 19-20.) Now, in order to demonstrate His love for humanity, even if He wanted to sacrifice Himself for our sins, it would be impossible in His eternal form, because no one can destroy Him. He is everlasting and too powerful. So, who then?

  • Someone who was not indestructible and could succumb to injuries.
  • Someone pure and sinless as required by the Passover and Atonement sacrifices.
  • Someone who had a mind, heart, a soul and, most importantly,  a will.

That last condition would rule out an animal, for though it is pure and sinless, it has no understanding of what it is doing. It lacks intelligence, analytical abilities and most importantly, a will to say: Yes, I know what is expected and involved, and I am willing to do this out of my own free will. Animals don’t have that. In fact, an animal will always try to pull away from being led anywhere because it will always try to save its life.

Hence, God the Son, who is the image of the invisible God (Colossians 1: 15).

  • His purpose was to be an intercessor (Romans 8:34) and to act as a bridge between judgment and mercy. Read: http://www.gotquestions.org/mercy-justice.html
  • His purpose was to fulfill the requirements of the law for the punishment of sin (Atonement) and, therefore, achieve forgiveness for all. (Romans 3:251 John 2:2, Romans 5:11) Read: https://bible.org/article/atonement-christ
  • His purpose was to shed the blood that would provide salvation from death (Passover). (1 Corinthians 5:7)
  • His purpose was to conquer death, which came in on the back of Adam and Eve’s sin, introduced by satan. (Romans 5:12-21, John 3:16, 1 Corinthians 15: 20, 55-57, 2 Timothy 1:10)

His purpose required Him to come in exactly the form of the people He wanted to save because He was going be dying in exchange for them. And so He came as a human being. 

That leaves the Holy Spirit, whose task is to change us through the life-long process of sanctification after salvation. It’s an internal job, requiring a form that can permeate the boundaries of flesh and bones. (1 Corinthians 3:16-17, 1 Corinthians 6:192 Corinthians 3:3, Ephesians 5:18, Galatians 4:6, John 14:16-17.) Yahowah is too Holy and powerful to reside within a body of flesh, which is essentially weak and sinful. After resurrection and ascension, Yahshua is seated at the right hand of Yahowah, mediating for us. The next time He returns to earth, He will do so to save His people from the anti-christ and to judge. Till He returns, the Holy Spirit has been given to us to us as Comforter and Counselor to help us, guide us and keep us. (John 14:26, Romans 8:26, 1 Corinthians 2:13, John 16:7-15, Romans 5:3-5.) To know more and understand better, read:

https://carm.org/christianity/christian-doctrine/verses-showing-identity-ministry-and-personhood-holy-spirit

http://www.desiringgod.org/messages/how-the-spirit-sanctifies

Click to access msj21h.pdf

So, I understand the need for a triune God. But the original question on the Jewish mind still remains unanswered: Isn’t it all heresy? That’s something I will be taking up in the next post, Yahowah willing.

Shalome

 


Leave a comment

Take 5 and then back we go.

I was reading some things written by Mosab Hassan Yousef, the author of The Son of Hamas. I read his blog every now and then when I want to understand something about the Palestine-Israel situation or I am trying to understand something about Islam from an (ex) insider’s perspective. He is straight speaking and clear, and it is remarkable what he has done. However, to be separated from the ones you love is a tough price to pay, no matter how much you believe you did the right thing. He hopes to return back to his homeland when there is peace.

Peace seems to be everyone’s favoured gift. Peace between warring factions, between religions, between countries, between ideologies. Peace that feels like cool shade in the hot sun and tastes as sweet as honey. However, if you are Christian, then the writing is pretty much on the wall. The Bible indicates that the world will only slide towards more unrest and turmoil as it starts to wind down and make way for a new kingdom and, with it, the reign of real peace under a just King. Before we see peace, though, we will see the Tribulation and Armageddon.

In the year to come, I pray that we find our peace in Christ and align our lives and expectations with the words, promises and prophecies of Yahowah.

For what it’s worth, Happy New Year. Don’t forget to be kind.